![illusion games japan facebook illusion games japan facebook](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dq1TEfLX4AERmEa.jpg)
He then noted that if a podcast complies with Spotify’s content policies - it doesn’t make clear what those are - then guests are not banned: “We are not going to ban specific individuals from being guests on other people’s shows, as the episode/show complies with our content policies.” “It’s important to have diverse voices and points of view on our platform.” It’s all too common that things are taken out of context.”īulleted talking points about controversial content seem to underscore how Spotify is sticking to a position of being a neutral platform, not a proactive curator: “Spotify has always been a place for creative expressions,” Gutierrez wrote. “However, it’s important that they aren’t simply flagging a piece of content just because of something they’ve read online. “If a team member has concerns about any piece of content on our platform, you should encourage them to report it to Trust & Safety because they are the experts on our team charged with reviewing content,” he wrote.
#Illusion games japan facebook how to#
Notably, while Spotify has detailed how to report illegal musical tracks or explicit lyrics on its platform, it has never outlined its content policies when it comes to podcasting.Īnd from the looks of it, the company has been using some delaying tactics in facing up to the problem more directly.īuzzFeed today has published a leaked memo from the company’s legal officer Horacio Gutierrez, from today, which appears to defend the company’s position on publishing controversial podcasts (not this one in particular), giving hosts the freedom to have whichever guests they want, and not responding to public outcry but to refer issues to Trust & Safety to investigate. We’ve had nothing for hours, and a colleague who asked the same questions months ago never heard back either.
#Illusion games japan facebook update#
We’ve tried to reach out to the company to get a response to questions about the show, and we will update if we hear back.
![illusion games japan facebook illusion games japan facebook](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/facebook_3dphoto.jpg)
įor now, Spotify is not saying anything in response to this publicly. If you want to understand how the polio vaccine works, talk to an actual fucking expert not some sociopath with no medical background who tortured Sandy Hook families. Letting Alex Jones spread anti-vaxxer conspiracies during a pandemic is indefensible. The conversation veered on to a number of other topics, such as how the Democrats were intentionally trying to crash the economy to make Trump look bad, and a discussion, very the foggy on details, of the effectiveness of vaccines (foggy, but probably enough strands of which, in the hands of a person already skeptical, may well be the tipping point to dismissing Covid-19 public health initiatives altogether). “Everything he touches he turns to gold.” (Except, it seems, this, this, and well, maybe many other things, actually.) “I was just trying to give you a Gestalt analysis,” Jones growled in response… He then went into a defense of Jared Kushner. Early on, for example, when Jones started to talk about how the Democrats are in the pocket of the lobbyists (while Trump was not, according to him), Rogan called up web links in real time, showing that this isn’t quite so clear, with AT&T admitting to paying Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen fees, to help advance its own position with Trump and his administration. Rogan made a few attempts at refuting or standing up some of the stories and claims that they covered. The conversation, which also featured comedian Tim Dillon, covered a pretty wide range of topics, with the common themes being today’s most controversial topics, unproven (or disproven) stories behind them presented as fact, and of course the dastardly Dems. That issue was highlighted in the last day, when Joe Rogan - the highly paid podcaster with a libertarian bent - brought on Alex Jones (of InfoWars fame, whose own podcast was removed from Spotify, along with YouTube and others, in 2018) on to his show for a meandering three hours, leading to an uproar over how Spotify is giving a spotlight and microphone to an infamous purveyor of misinformation. Now people are in an uproar of who, essentially, gets a platform on its platform.
![illusion games japan facebook illusion games japan facebook](https://www.denofgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/transistor.jpg)
That position, however, is being jolted into quite different territory now with its move into podcasting, which is raising lots of questions over what role Spotify should and could play in overseeing the content on its platform. But what about Spotify? The company is never mentioned in this context, and with its traditional business couched in streaming recorded music, you might understand why its biggest controversies over the last few years have been over how little musicians get paid. Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have taken a messy beating from critics unhappy with how they handle questionable content on their platform, with some complaining they don’t do enough to rein in misinformation, and others decrying censorship.